How to Price Catering Jobs (With Examples) (2026)
Quoting a catering job on gut feel is how you end up working a Saturday for nothing. Pricing catering, line by line, with two costed examples.
The formula, benchmarks by concept, the revenue maths and six levers that add turns
Short answer: table turnover rate is how many parties each table serves in a period, parties served divided by tables. Full-service restaurants typically run 1.5–3 turns a service: casual venues turn a table every 45–75 minutes, fine dining every two hours or so, quick service in 15–20 minutes. It matters because seats are perishable inventory: an empty chair at 7pm is revenue that expires at 7pm. The good news is that most slow turns are dead time (waiting to order, waiting to pay), not dining time, so you can add turns without rushing anyone. Here is the maths, then the levers.

Turnover = parties served ÷ number of tables, over a defined window. Twenty tables, fifty dinner parties: 2.5 turns. Two rules make the number useful instead of decorative. First, measure by daypart, lunch and dinner are different businesses sharing furniture. Second, measure by day of week, because “2.3 average” can hide a Tuesday of 1.2 and a Friday of 3.4 that need opposite fixes. Your POS already timestamps every order open and close, so this is a report, not a stopwatch project.
| Concept | Typical time per party | Typical turns per service |
|---|---|---|
| Quick service | 15–20 minutes | Very high; queue-limited |
| Café / brunch | 40–60 minutes | 2–3 |
| Casual dining | 45–75 minutes | 2–3.5 |
| Family restaurant | ~90 minutes | ~2–3 over a long service |
| Fine dining | ~120 minutes | 1–1.5, by design |
Fine dining sits at the bottom on purpose: the slow evening is the product. Everyone else is somewhere on a spectrum where extra turns are free money, which is worth quantifying before you decide how hard to work for them.
Say you run 18 tables, a $62 average check per party, and 2.0 dinner turns on Fridays and Saturdays. Lifting those two nights to 2.5 turns means 18 × 0.5 = 9 extra parties a night, about $558 a night, roughly $58,000 a year, from the same rent, the same kitchen and broadly the same roster. That is the scale of prize hiding in “we are always slammed at eight but people wait forever for the bill”. Run your own numbers before and after any change; the delta is the point.
The end of the meal is the cheapest place to find minutes, because the guest has already decided to leave. Flagging a server, waiting for the terminal, splitting the bill: that dance routinely eats 10–15 minutes per table. QR pay-at-table lets guests settle the moment they are ready, and restaurants using QR order-and-pay report up to 15% higher turnover. It is also the one lever with zero hospitality cost, nobody has ever wished the bill took longer.
The second-biggest dead zone is the start: seated, menus down, nobody has been past in ten minutes. Order-at-table QR (see how to set up QR ordering) lets the table order the moment they are ready while staff focus on hosting, and it lifts spend as well as speed, digital ordering consistently produces larger tickets, which is how this lever pairs with average order value instead of fighting it.
Long ticket times stretch every turn. Kitchen screens that sequence and time tickets, batch-friendly prep for the rush, and an 86-board that stops servers selling what the kitchen cannot make all shave minutes per course. If ticket times blow out only on Fridays, that is a scheduling problem wearing a kitchen costume.
A tight lunch menu of fast-execution dishes turns tables at speed; the slow-braise showpieces belong on the dinner page. Menu structure is a turnover tool as much as a margin tool, and the full method is in menu engineering.
Stagger bookings so the kitchen is not hit by one 7pm wave, quote honest wait times, and use a waitlist that texts guests when the table is ready. Every no-show is a turn amputated at the knee, which is why the no-show playbook (reminders, one-tap cancel, deposits on peak) is really a turnover strategy in disguise.
The minutes between one party leaving and the next sitting are pure loss. Pre-set stations, a clear-and-reset standard (“two minutes, two people”), and a host who can see table states at a glance keep the flow moving. This is where a live floor view earns its keep: knowing table 12 is on dessert lets you seat the queue with confidence instead of guesswork.
The distinction that keeps turnover from curdling into bad hospitality: speed up the waiting, never the dining. Guests should get menus fast, order when they are ready, receive food promptly and pay instantly, and feel zero pressure in between. If reviews start mentioning “felt rushed”, you have pulled lever 2 or 3 too hard; the fix is pacing, not abandoning the metric. And know when not to chase turns at all: a special-occasion venue sells the long evening, so its lever is average check and pre-paid seatings, not speed.
What is a good table turnover rate for a restaurant?
Most full-service restaurants land between 1.5 and 3 turns per service, casual venues at the higher end (a table every 45–75 minutes), fine dining lower (a table every ~2 hours), and quick service far higher (guests in and out in 15–20 minutes). The right target depends on your concept: the useful move is measuring your own rate by daypart and improving it against yourself, not against an industry average.
How do you calculate table turnover rate?
Parties served ÷ number of tables, for a defined period. If you have 20 tables and serve 50 parties across dinner service, your turnover is 2.5. Track it per daypart (lunch and dinner behave differently) and per day of week, because a Friday problem hides inside a weekly average. Your POS timestamps make this a five-minute report, not a clipboard exercise.
How can I turn tables faster without rushing guests?
Attack the dead time, not the dining time. Most slow turns are not guests lingering over food; they are waiting to order, waiting for the bill, and waiting to pay. QR order-and-pay removes the two biggest waits (restaurants report up to ~15% more turnover), kitchen pacing keeps courses flowing, and clearing plus resetting fast recovers minutes at the end. Guests should never feel the clock; they should just never find themselves waiting.
Does faster table turnover reduce the average check?
It can if you speed up the wrong part. Cutting the waiting time raises turns without touching spend, but rushing the ordering moment kills the second drink and the dessert. The order matters: fix pay-time and reset-time first, and protect the moments where guests decide to spend more. Turnover and average order value are partners when you speed up the queue, and enemies when you speed up the guest.
Is table turnover relevant for casual and counter-service spots?
Yes, it just wears a different name: seat utilisation and queue speed. A café flipping a four-top of laptop campers at 11am into three lunch parties has made hundreds of dollars appear from the same furniture. Counter-service versions of the levers are the same: order-ahead, fast payment, and a layout that keeps the line and the seats moving.
Storefront, orders, kitchen, CRM and marketing in one place. Start free in a couple of minutes, no card needed. Pop in your email and we'll take you straight to setup.
Storefront, POS, kitchen, CRM, marketing. One login, one bill. NZ$1/month for the first 3 months.
Start free trial